6 days Ago By Rachel Amery
Greens MSP Maggie Chapman is to face a vote to oust her from a key Holyrood committee after accusing the Supreme Court of “bigotry” and “hatred”. The North East Scotland MSP has come under fierce criticism for comments she made at a pro-trans rally where she said the court showed “bigotry, prejudice and hatred” in its verdict on the legal definition of a woman. READ MORE: Green MSP criticised for accusing Supreme Court of 'bigotry, prejudice and hatred' over gender ruling Since then, there have been several calls for her to be removed as the deputy convener of the equalities, human rights and civil justice committee, including from the Faculty of Advocates .
This comes after the UK Supreme Court ruled the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 refers to biological sex, and said the Scottish Government was “incorrect” to issue guidance that suggested trans women could be classed as women for some pieces of legislation. Conservative MSP Tess White, who also sits on the committee, has put forward a motion to have Ms Chapman thrown off the group. Her motion is listed as the first item on the agenda for when the committee next meets on Tuesday morning.
For the best Scottish politics news and analysis, get The Steamie newsletter The committee is made up of three SNP MSPs, two Conservatives, one Labour, and Ms Chapman from the Scottish Greens. It is understood Ms Chapman will be able to take part in the vote. Earlier this week the dean of the Faculty of Advocates, Roddy Dunlop KC, said Ms Chapman’s comments were “outrageous” and an “egregious breach” of her duties as an MSP, adding she “fails to respect the rule of law”.
He said: “These are appalling comments to come from any elected politician. They are all the worse when they come from someone who holds the post of deputy convener of the Scottish Parliament’s equalities, human rights and civil justice committee.” For Women Scotland, who had brought forward the legal case against the Scottish Government, have also said they will be snubbing the committee until Ms Chapman is removed.
The group had been asked to provide its reflections on the Supreme Court judgement, but have since said: “While Maggie Chapman remains on that committee, we cannot see how we can respond. “We have always been happy to engage with those who disagree with us. But we cannot engage with those who rabble-rouse, disrespect the rule of law, lie about the women who supported us and flout parliamentary standards.
”.
