NFL analyst says the Browns made the right decision by not going all in on Travis Hunter in the draft

featured-image

A move that has sparked debate Leer

he first day of the held April 24 in , provided plenty of surprises to keep fans on the edge of their seats. Among them, the ' bold strategy to secure two-way talent was the one that generated the most buzz around the league and on social media. The struck an ambitious deal with the to move up from the fifth pick to the second overall in the , giving up several key picks in the process.

They put all their faith in , the 2024 whom they see as a key piece in redefining the team's future. The last-minute strategy caught everyone by surprise, as more than 24 hours after the move, everyone still has their doubts about the family's approach. Another group of fans were not happy with the decision, as they felt Hunter was the right player to lift the franchise.



A former NFL player disagrees: Brown's master class Chase Daniel, former quarterback and current analyst, disagrees with some critics of the move and believes it was a smart strategy on the part of the . The Browns made a smart move by signing Mason Graham, the best tackle in the draft, and regaining their 2026 first-round pick. Although they gave up Travis Hunter, they are believed to be thinking long-term, stockpiling talent with an eye on next year's promising quarterback class.

The decision was surprising, but it seems well thought out, explained on The truth is that the debate continues and seems to be very divided, with some applauding 's decision and others criticizing . Without a doubt, they gave us a memorable moment in the.