At Harvard, a Clash Between Democracy and Monarchy

Curtis Yarvin, the computer engineer turned neo-monarchist blogger, seems to be everywhere these days. His argument that American democracy has exhausted itself and needs to be replaced by a form of one-man rule has made him a star on the right, reportedly like Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel and JD Vance. Since the re-election of President Trump, he has drawn increasing attention from mainstream outlets, .

And on Monday night, he seemed to have arrived at the heart of “the Cathedral,” as he calls the intertwined elite intellectual institutions that shape our society. “I want to thank Harvard University,” Mr. Yarvin said to a standing-room crowd of about 100 at the university’s faculty club, before correcting himself.



“I mean, the school where we are.” Mr. Yarvin was in town to debate Danielle Allen, a prominent political theorist and democracy advocate at Harvard.

From the moment the event was announced, some wondered why Professor Allen would risk lending legitimacy to such an extreme figure by debating him. Others rushed to snap up the limited tickets. The debate — organizers (and the university’s press office) were at pains to emphasize — was not an official Harvard event.

Instead, it was organized by , the publisher of Mr. Yarvin’s new book, “Gray Mirror: Fascicle 1, Disturbance,” and the a conservative student group that cheekily bills itself as Harvard’s “premier organization for the reinvention of man.” We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and your Times account, or for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? . Want all of The Times? .

.